World
America declares international law for thee but not for me

In Orwellian totalitarianism, two plus two can equal five. But with American hegemony, things can be A and not A at the same time.
Here’s the question: when they rule against states, don’t arbitral tribunals at The Hague pose as much of a challenge to their sovereignty as the ICC or any international court?
The US is not a party to the ICC or the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Unclos) on which the South China Sea arbitration was based. That tribunal was set up under Annex VII of Unclos. The Permanent Court of Arbitration served as the case’s registry.
The arbitration invalidated most of Beijing’s maritime claims, then referred to as the nine-dash line.
So why support one set of international laws but declare war on another?

Headlines15 hours agoI retired as an Asst. Director, equal to a Brigadier, while Al-Mustapha retired as a Major—Dennis Amachree
Headlines15 hours agoObi Is A Trader, Traders Have Short-term Calculation, They’re Not Into Longterm Projection-Oshiomhole
Headlines15 hours agoWhy Didn’t He Ask Those Probing Questions Like Seun Okinbaloye?–Olayinka Tackles Rufai Oseni Over Peter Obi’s TV Interview
Special Report17 hours ago“We Have Done Everything Possible for Peace, But Adwoa Safo Wants GH¢3.7 Million Before Releasing Our Father’s Body” — Nana Kwadwo Safo Akofena
Special Report20 hours agoThree Women, Including Pregnant Victim, Injured in Paris Stabbing; Suspect Allegedly Made Chilling Claim
News21 hours agoAEDC Rewards 1,126 Employees with Promotions and Step Increments in Landmark Investment in Talent and Career Growth
Special Report20 hours ago“We Need To Wipe Both NPP And NDC Away” — Captain Smart’s Old Comments Resurface Amid Political Ambitions
News22 hours agoBBNaija S11: Temi Nkem Clashes With Housemates Over English During First Task




















